ELEMENTS OF A QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODEL FOR SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DATA ON ATMOSPHERIC PHENOMENA OBTAINED VIA GEOSENSOR NETWORKS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The paper addresses the relevant scientific and technical problem of developing theoretical foundations for the quality assessment of spatio-temporal data on atmospheric phenomena obtained via geosensor networks. The limitations of current World Meteorological Organization guidelines are demonstrated. The study substantiates the necessity of employing small-scale monitoring networks to capture local meteorological processes that fall below the resolution limits of national observation systems. The authors formulate the requirement for a model applicable to both internal (provider-side) and external (consumer-side) quality assessment across various scenarios: technology design, supplier selection, and regular input/ output control. A framework consisting of 26 elements is proposed for the subsequent construction of a data quality assessment model. These elements incorporate both the aspects provided by individual geosensors and their internal measurement and processing functions, as well as the emergent properties of the entire geosensor network. The proposed approach accounts for both the instrumental accuracy of individual sensors and systemic network characteristics, including spatial uniformity, temporal regularity, and data timeliness. Finally, future research and development directions in this field are outlined.

Keywords:
spatio-temporal data, quality assessment, atmospheric phenomena, geosensor network
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Kim G.-H., Lee D.-G., Shin S.-S., et al. Effects of Urban Green Using the Integrated Meteorological Sensors // Proceedings of the Spring Meeting of Korean Meteorological Society. Jeju, 2014. P. 120–121.

2. Winning Jr.T.E., Illston B.G., Ferris M.M., et al. An Overview of the Oklahoma City Urban Micronet Test Facility // Proceedings of the American Meteorological Society 14th Symposium on Meteorological Observation and Instrumentation, January 14–18, 2007. San Antonio, 2007. P. 1–5.

3. Devillers R., Jeansoulin R. Spatial Data Quality: Concepts // Fundamentals of Spatial Data Quality / ed. by R. Devillers, R. Jeansoulin. Newport Beach: Wiley-ISTE, 2006. P. 31–42. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612156.ch2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612156.ch2

4. Boin A.T., Hunter G.J. Do Spatial Data Consumers Really Understand Data Quality Information? // Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. Lisbon, 2006. P. 215–224.

5. Devillers R., Gervais M., Bedard Y., et al. Spatial Data Quality: From Metadata to Quality Indicators and Contextual End-User Manual // Proceedings of the OEEPE/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Spatial Data Quality Management, March 21–22, 2002. Istanbul, 2002. P. 45–55.

6. Alerskans E., Lussana C., Nipen T., et al. Optimizing Spatial Quality Control for a Dense Network of Meteorological Stations // Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. 2022. Vol. 39. Iss. 7. P. 973–984. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0184.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0184.1

7. Sicari S., Rizzardi A., Cappiello C., et al. Toward Data Governance in the Internet of Things // New Advances in the Internet of Things. Studies in Computational Intelligence. 2018. Vol. 715. P. 59–74. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58190-3_4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58190-3_4

8. Kemper D., Iggena T., Toenjes R., et al. Valid.IoT: A Framework for Sensor Data Quality Analysis and Interpolation // Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys’18). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. P. 294–303. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3204949.3204972. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204949.3204972

9. Buelvas J.H., Múnera D., Gaviria N. DQ-MAN: A Tool for Multidimensional Data Quality Analysis in IoT-Based Air Quality Monitoring Systems // Internet of Things. 2023. Vol. 22. P. 100769. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100769

10. Buelvas J., Múnera D., Tobón V. Data Quality in IoT-Based Air Quality Monitoring Systems: A Systematic Mapping Study // Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2023. Vol. 234. No. 4. P. 248. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06127-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06127-9

11. Meritxell G., Sierra B., Ferreiro S. On the Evaluation, Management and Improvement of Data Quality in Streaming Time Series // IEEE Access. 2022. Vol. 10. P. 81458–81475. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3195338. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195338

12. Herfort B., Lautenbach S., Porto de Albuquerque J., et al. A Spatio-Temporal Analysis Investigating Completeness and Inequalities of Global Urban Building Data in OpenStreetMap // Nature Communications. 2023. Vol. 14. P. 3985. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39698-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39698-6

13. Weiß I., Vogel‐Heuser B. A Metric and Visualization of Completeness in Multi-Dimensional Data Sets of Sensor and Actuator Data Applied to a Condition Monitoring Use Case // Applied Sciences. 2021. Vol. 11. Iss. 11. P. 5022. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/app11115022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115022

14. Gruzdev A.N. Uchet avtokorrelyacii v zadache lineynoy regressii na primere analiza obschego soderzhaniya NO2 v atmosfere // Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Fizika atmosfery i okeana. 2019. T. 55, № 1. S. 73–82. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.31857/S0002-351555173-82. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002-351555173-82

15. Belysheva Yu.V., Materuhin A.V. Problema ocenki kachestva prostranstvenno-vremennyh dannyh, poluchaemyh ot sistemy meteorologicheskih nablyudeniy // Prilozhenie k zhurnalu Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». Sbornik statey po itogam nauchno-tehnicheskoy konferencii. 2020. № 11. S. 149–151.

16. Kurlov A.V., Materuhin A.V. Analiz trebovaniy k kachestvu prostranstvenno-vremennyh dannyh v zadachah territorial'nogo planirovaniya // Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». 2022. T. 66, № 4. S. 59–68. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30533/0536-101X-2022-66-4-59-68. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_50467446_68331582.pdf

17. Lehner W., Klein A. How to Optimize the Quality of Sensor Data Streams // Fourth International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology. Cannes/La Bocca: IEEE, 2009. P. 13–19. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICCGI.2009.10. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5279766

18. Petrovic P. Selection of Data Sets by Quality and Its Role in Climate Research // Detecting and Modelling Regional Climate Change / M. Brunet, D. Lopez Bonillo (eds.). Berlin: Springer, 2001. P. 21–29. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04313-4_3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04313-4_3

Login or Create
* Forgot password?