UDC 528.44
CSCSTI 36.01
The article discusses in detail the conceptual apparatus currently used in the coordination support of cadastral works, which are carried out to fill the Unified State Register of Real Estate with up-to-date and reliable information about real estate objects located in the corresponding territory. A conceptual apparatus is proposed, due to the problem situation that arose as a result of the recalculation of the coordinates of state geodetic network points by Rosreestr in 2022 into a local coordinate system in a number of regions of the Russian Federation, including in the Kemerovo region. The introduction of the following new terms is proposed and justified from a legal point of view: “territorial formation”, “coordinate space of territorial formation”, “deformation of coordinate space”, “geospace of territorial formation”, “actual geospace of territorial formation”. At the same time, the compatibility of the proposed conceptual apparatus with existing regulatory documents defining the requirements for the implementation of cadastral work in the territory of the Russian Federation is considered. The structure of the geospace of territorial formation is determined in which elements (points of state geodetic networks) forming the coordinate space are distinguished. In relation to these elements, a statistical criterion has been proposed that makes it possible to determine whether the geospace of the corresponding territorial formation is relevant or not. Based on the developed mathematical algorithm and relevant production materials, it was established that the geospace of the Kemerovo region is not relevant.
geospace, structure, structural elements, coordinate space, territorial formation, relevance, boundaries of real estate and land management, land category, Unified State Register of Real Estate
1. Klyushnichenko V.N., Ivchatova N.S. Osobennosti formirovaniya kadastra v Rossii // Vestnik SGUGiT. 2020. № 2. S. 198–208. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33764/2411-1759-2020- 25-2-198-208.
2. Alakoz V.V. O problemah geodezicheskogo obespecheniya kadastra nedvizhimosti i sovershenstvovanii kadastrovoy deyatel'nosti // Zemleustroystvo, kadastr i monitoring zemel'. 2020. T. 10. № 189. S. 51–58. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33920/sel-4-2010-07.
3. Lamert D.A., Obidenko V.I., Karpik A.P. Realizaciya «dorozhnoy karty»: puti povysheniya kachestva prostranstvennogo opisaniya ob'ektov gosudarstvennogo kadastra nedvizhimosti // Geodeziya i kartografiya. 2013. № 12. S. 45–49.
4. Sizov A.P. Opyt ispol'zovaniya metodov matematicheskoy statistiki pri analize rezul'tatov gosudarstvennogo zemel'nogo nadzora // Geodeziya i kartografiya. 2019. T. 80. № 10. S. 55–64. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22389/0016-7126-2019-952-10-55-64.
5. Avrunev E.I., Gorobcov S.R. Geodezicheskoe obespechenie kadastrovyh rabot: monografiya. Novosibirsk: SGUGiT, 2024. 238 s.
6. Karpik A.P., Horoshilov V.S. Suschnost' geoinformacionnogo prostranstva territoriy kak edinoy osnovy razvitiya gosudarstvennogo kadastra nedvizhimosti // Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». 2012. № 1. S. 134–136.
7. Karpik A.P. Informacionnoe obespechenie geodezicheskoy prostranstvennoy informacionnoy sistemy // Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». 2013. № 4/S. S. 70–73.
8. Karpik A.P., Lisickiy D.V. Elektronnoe geoprostranstvo — suschnost' i konceptual'nye osnovy // Geodeziya i kartografiya. 2009. № 5. S. 41–44.
9. Karpik A.P. Metodologicheskie i tehnologicheskie osnovy geoinformacionnogo obespecheniya territoriy: monografiya. Novosibirsk: SGGA, 2004. 259 s.
