Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
Spatial Development Strategy of the Rusian Federation 2025 was adopted in 2019 at the Economic Development Ministry Initiative. It defines tasks, principles, priorities and main directions of Russian spatial development. Therefore, an analytical review of spatial models in economy, identification of existing problems and e development of recommendations and proposals on the further development of economy-based territorial organization is becoming relevant. This article identifies and briefly characterizes the main development pathways of spatial models in economy over the past two centuries – classical, multi-regional, Starrett’s Spatial Impossibility Theorem (Starrett), empirical (experimental) studies of uneven spatial development, continuous space, new economic geography, new urban economy, spatial econometrics , simulation modeling in economy, GIS application in spatial models used in economy. There is an attempt to structure spatial models in economy according to several parameters (time, direction of evolution, authors, space used, practical and theoretical results). The article also solves an applied problem based on the mathematical assessment of the region spatial value determination. The study includes open data from Internet resources, regulatory and industry documents, national development projects of the Russian Federation, and the results of the author’s research. The future research aspects are outlined as well.

Keywords:
d spatial models, spatial development, multi-regional models
References

1. Suslov VI. Models of spatial economy: genesis, current state, prospects. Region: economics and sociology. 2013;2(78): 3–19.

2. Tyunen IG. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie [An isolated state]. 1926. URL: https://ia600804.us.archive.org/35/items/Tunen/Tunen. pdf. (Accessed: 10.06.2022).

3. Blaug M. Economic theory of space use and the classical theory of production location. Economic thought in retrospective. Moscow. 1994; 568–585.

4. Golubchik MM, Evdokimov SP, Maksimov GN, Nosonov AM. Regional studies and geography (some initial provisions). URL: https://artno.ucoz.ru/regissl.pdf. (Accessed: 10.06.2022).

5. Baranov A, Dondokov Z, Slepenkova Yu. Construcion and using regional input-output models for analysis and forecasting of regions’ economy development. Ideas and Ideals. 2016;2: 66-85. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2016-4.2-66-85.

6. Vol. 2. P. 66–85. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2016-4.2-66-85.

7. Regional science matters: studies dedicated to Walter Isard. Ed. by Nijkamp P, Rose A, Kourtit K. Springer; 2015. 460 p. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07305-7.

8. Cho JK, Gordon P, Moore JE II, et al. TransNIEMO: Economic Impact Analysis Using a Model of Consistent Interregional Economic and Network Equilibria . CESifo Working Paper Series, No. 4601. 2014. URL: https://www.cesifo.org/en/publications/2014/working-paper/transniemo-economic-impact-analysis-using-model-consistent. (Accessed:10.06.2022).

9. Entropy methods of modeling complex systems. Translated from English by Wilson AJ. Publishing House “Nauka”; 1978. 247 p.

10. Imelbaev ShS, Shmulyan BL. Modeling of stochastic communication systems. Supplement to the translation of the book by Wilson AJ. Publishing House “Nauka”; 1978; 170–233.

11. Shmulyan BL. Entropy model of the urban system. Automation and Telemechanics. 1979;10: 70–83.

12. Starrett D. Market Allocations of Location Choice in A Model with Free Mobility. Journal of Economic Theory. 1978;9: 418–448.

13. Spatial analysis of socio-economic systems: history and modernity. Proceedings of the Granberg conference. Novosibirsk; 2017. 526 p.

14. Topoleva TN. Genesis of conceptual approaches of spatial economics: fundamental theories, new trends and prospects of research. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2022;4(94): 94–130. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2022-4-94-130.

15. Dixit A, Stiglitz J. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review. 1977;67(3): 297–308.

16. Emelyanov AA. Structural analysis and dynamic simulation models in economics. Moscow:Publishing House “Finance and statistics”; 1998.

17. Emelyanov AA, Vlasova EA. Simulation modeling in economic information systems. Moscow: Publishing House “MESI”; 1998.

18. Buslenko NP. Modeling of complex systems. Moscow: Publishing House “Nauka”; 1978.

19. Naylor T. Machine simulation experiments with models of economic systems. Moscow:Publishing House “Mir”; 1975.

20. Shannon R. Simulation of systems: science and art. Moscow: Publishing House “Mir”; 1978.

21. Larin YuV, Krasnopevtseva BV, Sinitsyna AL, et al. Systematization and analysis of initial data for GIS of parking lots and parking lots in order to develop an economic and mathematical model (the example of Moscow). Proceedings of the 58th scientific and technical conference for students, graduate students and young scientists of MIIGAiK. Moscow; 2003. P. 213–219.

22. Sinitsyna AL. Development of Economic and Mathematic Model in Frames of Transport Component for Megapolice GIS (Moscow example). Proceedings of the International Conference Intercarto 11. Sustainable development of territories: GIS theory and practical experience. Stavropol; 2005. P. 104–110.

23. Sinitsyna AL, Shingareva KB, Feldman IA. GIS concept Development for the Road and Transport Complex of Megacity (Moscow as example). Proceedings of the International Conference Intercarto 12. GIS for the sustainable development of territories. Kaliningrad; 2006. P. 168–171.

24. Sinitsyna AL. Condition and Analysis of Megacity RTC GIS (The Russian Experience Review). Proceedings of the International Conference Intercarto/InterGIS 15. Sustainable development of territories: GIS theory and practical experience. Perm; 2009. P. 133–142.

25. Sinitsyna AL. Basic principles for constructing a GIS DTK of a metropolis (on the example of the city of Moscow). Proceedings of the International Conference Intercarto/InterGIS 15. Sustainable development of territories: GIS theory and practical experience. 2009; 220–231.

26. Sinitsyna AL. Comparative analysis of the managerial aspect of the GIS DTC of a metropolis (foreign experience) (article). Proceedings of the International Scientific and Technical Conference ”Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre”. Moscow; 2009. P. 220–229.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?