employee
Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
UDC 528.3
CSCSTI 36.16
The article evaluates the multipath effect in GNSS measurements using the RINGO software based on data from an automated geodetic monitoring system of one of the high-pressure hydroelectric power plants in the Russian Federation. The identified multipath values at the stations were assessed according to the criteria recommended by the International GNSS Service (IGS). The comparison results revealed that all reference stations of the automated geodetic monitoring system meet the IGS recommended criteria. Out of seven monitoring points, only one satisfies the multipath evaluation criteria, while two points exhibit unacceptable values. The possible cause of the low quality of satellite measurements at these stations could be obstacles near the stations that block the antenna’s radio horizon, interrupt, or reflect GNSS signals. It is recommended to include a preliminary analysis of GNSS measurements in the structure of the automated geodetic monitoring system. This analysis would help identify unsuitable locations for station placement in the deformation network and, if necessary, exclude the coordinates of monitoring points affected by significant multipath interference from further analysis. Additionally, it is recommended to conduct a preliminary analysis of GNSS measurements at differential geodetic stations to verify their compliance with IGS criteria. Based on this analysis, they could be integrated into the current structure of the State Geodetic Network.
multipath, GNSS measurements, automated satellite monitoring system, RINGO, criteria for assessing multipath, International GNSS Service
1. Misra P.N., Enge P. Global Positioning System. Signals, Measurements and Performance. Lincoln: Ganga-Jamuna Press, 2001. 390 p.
2. Leick A., Rapoport L., Tatarnikov D. GPS Satellite Surveying. New York: A WilleyInterscience Publication, 2015. 806 p.
3. Kosarev N.S., Antonovich K.M., Lipatnikov L.A. The method of cycle-slip detection and repair GNSS measurements by using receiver with high stability frequency oscillator // Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy. 2019. Vol. 49. No. 3. P. 283–301. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2478/congeo-2019-0015.
4. Antonovich K.M. Ispol'zovanie sputnikovyh radionavigacionnyh sistem v geodezii: monografiya: v 2 t. M.: Kartgeocentr, 2006. T. 2. 360 s.
5. Antonovich K.M. Ispol'zovanie sputnikovyh radionavigacionnyh sistem v geodezii: monografiya: v 2 t. M.: Kartgeocentr, 2005. T. 1. 334 s.
6. Tatarnikov D.V., Astahov A.V., Stepanenko A.P. i dr. Antennye tehnologii vysokotochnogo sputnikovogo pozicionirovaniya // Antenny. 2016. № 10 (230). S. 77–89.
7. Veycel' A.V., Zhodzishskiy M.I., Milyutin D.S. Oshibki mnogoluchevosti dlya razlichnyh sputnikovyh signalov // Informacionno-izmeritel'nye i upravlyayuschie sistemy. 2009. № 8. S. 34‒41.
8. Lau L. Investigations into the residual multipath errors of choke-ring geodetic antennas on GNSS carrier-phase measurements // GPS Solutions. 2025. Vol. 29. P. 42. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01801-9.
9. Kupriyanov A.O., Neyman Yu.M., Morozov D.A. i dr. Razrabotka algoritma analiza pereotrazheniy navigacionnogo signala dlya izucheniya vliyaniya mnogoluchevosti na GNSS-izmereniya // Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». 2017. № 6. S. 41–44.
10. Kupriyanov A.O., Morozov D.A., Perminov A.Yu. Metodika chislennogo opredeleniya vliyaniya mnogoluchevosti na kodovye i fazovye izmereniya po signalam GNSS // Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». 2020. T. 64, № 4. S. 391–398. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30533/0536-101X-2020-64-4-391-398.
11. Perminov A.Yu., Morozov D.A., Kupriyanov A.O. Eksperimental'naya aprobaciya metodiki opredeleniya vliyaniya mnogoluchevosti na kodovye i fazovye izmereniya po signalam GNSS // Izvestiya vuzov «Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka». 2022. T. 66, № 5. S. 6–13. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.30533/0536-101H-2022-66-5-6-13.
12. Kaftan V.I., Ustinov A.V. Primenenie global'nyh navigacionnyh sputnikovyh sistem dlya monitoringa deformaciy gidrotehnicheskih sooruzheniy // Gidrotehnicheskoe stroitel'stvo. 2012. № 12. S. 11–19.
13. Ustinov A.V. Tehnologiya sputnikovogo geodezicheskogo monitoringa gidrotehnicheskih sooruzheniy // Gidrotehnicheskoe stroitel'stvo. 2014. № 6. S. 39–43.
14. García-Armenteros J.A. Quality assessment of the Topo-Iberia CGPS stations and data quality’s effects on postfit ionosphere-free phase residuals // Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2024. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 189–199. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2023.07.006.
15. Gałdyn F., Zajdel R., Sośnica K. RINEXAV: GNSS global network selection opensource software based on qualitative analysis of RINEX files // SoftwareX. 2023. Vol. 22. P. 101372. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2023.101372.
16. Bălă A.C., Drăgulescu B.C., Brebu F.-M. Analyzing Rinex data files using the Python programming language // Journal of applied engineering sciences. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 167–177. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2024-0021.
17. Václavovic P., Dousa J. G-Nut/Anubis – open-source tool for multi-GNSS data monitoring // International Association of Geodesy Symposia. 2015. Vol. 143. P. 775–782. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/13 45_2015_97.
18. Chen Z., Cui Y., Li L., et al. GDP: an open-source GNSS data preprocessing toolkit // GPS Solutions. 2020. Vol. 24. P. 87. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01003-z.
19. Lu L., Hu W., Wu T. GDPS: an open-source python-based software package for multiGNSS data preprocessing // GPS Solutions. 2024. Vol. 28. P. 138. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-024-01678-8.
